9. Amelino-Camelia, G. (2003) “Quantum-gravity phenomenology,” Physics World 16 (11): 43-47.
10. Amelino-Camelia, G., L. Smolin, A. Starodubtsev (2004) “Quantum symmetry, the cosmological constant and Planck-scale phe-
nomenology,” Classical and Quantum Gravity 21 (13): 3095-3110.
11. Amelino-Camelia, G. (2013) “Quantum-Spacetime Phenomenology,” Living Reviews in Relativity 16 (1): 5(135).
12. Allori, V. (2019) “Quantum mechanics, time and ontology,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in
History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 66 (1):145-154.
13. Aspect, A., R. Grangier, G. Roger (1981) “Experimental tests of realistic local theories via Bell’s theorem,” Physical Review
Letters 47 (7): 460-463.
14. Aspect, A., R. Grangier, G. Roger (1982) “Experimental Realization of Einstein- Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedanken Experiment:
A New Violation of Bell’s Inequalities,” Physical Review Letters 49 (2): 91-94.
15. Auffèves, A., P. Grangier (2016) “Contexts, Systems and Modalities: A New Ontology for Quantum Mechanics,” Foundations
of Physics 46 (2): 121-137.
16. Ay, N., W. Tuschmann (2003) “Duality versus dual flatness in quantum information geometry,” Journal of Mathematical Phys-
ics 44 (4): 1512(7).
17. Ashtekar. A., T. A. Schilling (1999) “Geometrical Formulation of Quantum Mechanics,” in (A. Harvey, ed.) On Einstein’s Path:
Essays in Honor of Engelbert Schucking. New York: Springer, pp. 23-65.
18. Avron, J. E., O. Kenneth (2009) “Entanglement and the geometry of two qubits,” Annals of Physics 324 (2): 470-496.
19. Baianu, I. C., R. Brown, J. F. Glazebrook (2007) “A Non-Abelian, Categorical Ontology of Spacetimes and Quantum Gravity,”
Axiomathes 17 (3-4): 353-408.
20. Bain, J. (2013) “CPT Invariance, the Spin-Statistics Connection, and the Ontology of Relativistic Quantum Field Theories,
Erkenntnis 78 (4) 797-821.
21. Baltag, A., S. Smets (2006) “LQP: the dynamic logic of quantum information,” Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 16
(3): 491-525.
22. Baltag, A., S. Smets (2011) “Correlated Information: A Logic for Multi-Partite Quantum Systems,” Electronic Notes in Theoret-
ical Computer Science 270 (2): 3-14.
23. Banchi, L,, P. Giorda, P. Zanardi (2014) “Quantum information-geometry of dissipative quantum phase transitions,” Physical
Review E 89 (2): 022102(10).
24. Barnum, H. (2003) “Quantum information processing, operational quantum logic, convexity, and the foundations of physics,”
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34 (3): 343-379.
25. Barrow, J, D., J. Levin (2001) “Twin paradox in compact spaces,” Physical Review A 63 (4): 044104(4).
26. Basini, G., S. Capozziello (2005) “Quantum mechanics, relativity and time,” General Relativity and Gravitation 37 (1): 115-165.
27. Bartels, A, (1999) “Objects or Events? Towards an Ontology for Quantum Field Theory,” Philosophy of Science 66 (3): S170-
S184.
28. Bell, J. (1964) On the Einstein ‒ Podolsky ‒ Rosen paradox,” Physics (New York) 1 (3): 195-200.
29. Belousek, D. W. (2003) “Non-separability, Non-supervenience, and Quantum Ontology,” Philosophy of Science 70 (4): 791-811.
30. Ben-Ya’acov, U. (2016) “The ‘twin paradox’ in relativistic rigid motion,” European Journal of Physics 37 (5): 055601(13).
31. Berghofer, P., P. Goyal, H. A. Wiltsche (2021) “Husserl, the mathematization of nature, and the informational reconstruction of
quantum theory,” Continental Philosophy Review 54 (4) 413-436.
32. Berkovitz, J. (1998) “Aspects of Quantum Non-Locality II: Superluminal Causation and Relativity,” Studies in History and Phi-
losophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 29 (4): 509-545.
33. Bertram, W. (2008) “Is There a Jordan Geometry Underlying Quantum Physics?” International Journal of Theoretical Physics
47 (10): 2754-2782.
34. Bigaj, T. (2018) “Are field quanta real objects? Some remarks on the ontology of quantum field theory,” Studies in History and
Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 62 (1): 145-157.
35. Bilban, T. (2021) “Informational foundations of quantum theory: critical reconsideration from the point of view of a phenome-
nologist,” Continental Philosophy Review 54 (4): 581–594.
36. Blaylock, G. (2010) “The EPR paradox, Bell’s inequality, and the question of locality,” American Journal of Physics 78 (1): 111-
120.
37. Boblest, S., T. Müller, G. Wunner (2011) “Twin paradox in de Sitter spacetime,” European Journal of Physics 32 (5): 1117-1142.
38. Boccaletti, D., F. Catoni, V. Catoni (2007) “Space-Time Trigonometry and Formalization of the “Twin Paradox” for Uniform and
Accelerated Motions,” Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras 17 (1): 1-22.
39. Boccaletti, D., F. Catoni, V. Catoni (2007a) “Formalization of the “Twin Paradox” for Non-uniformly Accelerated Motions,”
Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras 17 (4): 611-616.
40. Bodendorfer, N. (2014) “A note on entanglement entropy and quantum geometry,” Classical and Quantum Gravity 31 (21):
214004(13)
41. Boge, F. J. (2019) “Quantum Information Versus Epistemic Logic: An Analysis of the Frauchiger–Renner Theorem,” Foundation
of Physics 49 (10): 1143–1165.
42. Bokulich, A, G. Jaeger, eds. (2010) Philosophy of quantum information and entanglement. Cambridge: University Press.